Print

From the youngest age I can remember, my growth from toddler to teenager had an unhealthy dose of racism. Growing up around Charleston SC in the 60s and 70s provided countless opportunities from family members and acquaintances to become a bigoted, n*****r hating, foulmouthed redneck like so many of them were.

The problem is, the racism wasn't just a product of those extreme individuals.

I went to school at Whitesides Elementary and later Laing Middle School. I also played football in the recreation leagues of Mount Pleasant SC from the age of 6. My friends during these years were just as likely to be black as white. In spite of the racist environment I grew up in, one of the three best friends I had throughout childhood was black.

As I got older, I'd hear my father say "well he's a good n****r" over and over again. The older black gentleman that retired from the ports and went around collecting cans and doing yardwork, including some for our family, was always referred to as a "good n*****r. And he was probably the best friend my dad had in his later years, while my dad never quit using that term.

Throughout that childhood, there were many fights and arguments I had with cousins and other family members when they used the term n****r, regardless of the context. My father was a Boston Celtics fan because they played more white guys. The derogatory term n*****r was used, regardless of color, as the ultimate insult.

So why am I not a sheet wearing, tobacco spitting, loudmouthed bigot?

Simply put, its wrong.

I judge a man by his deeds and actions, not by his skin color.

I alone had the power to become the person I wanted to be, and so does everyone reading this.

Many of you might've noticed some of the postings I put on Facebook recently. While it may seem to some that I'm being racist, nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, its quite the opposite.

Blacks in this country suffered horrible treatment at the hands of whites for many years. Some still do today. The difference (while its always been there to some extent) is that many whites suffer horrible treatment at the hands of blacks and even more blacks receive horrible treatment at the hands of their own race.

While there's been plenty of documentation regarding black on black crime, black prison population, black single mothers, etc... there's very little blame that goes where it should.

There's a big reason that so many black politicians and/or political figures are democrat. It gives them control of their black constituents. While I don't in any way believe that its the case for all black politicians, a large group of them truly seek to benefit by keeping their constituents under their thumb. Those like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have all become very wealthy by pandering to those that benefit from welfare and racial tension. They only show up at protests like those that happened in Ferguson MO to stay relevant with those blind sheep that keep sending them money. Everyone remember Jackson and Sharpton both asking for donations while there? Anyone remember the democrat voter registration push at those protests?

Using today's welfare statistics (located here) its easy to see what supporting the liberal agendas of Jackson, Sharpton, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others has led to

Whites make up over 72% of the entire US population while blacks make up just 13%

Despite that overwhelming minority, blacks make up almost 40% of welfare recipients. Nearly all of that 40% are registered democrats.

Here's some other numbers for you to ponder.

(link here) The out-of-wedlock birth rate among African Americans today is 73%, three times higher than it was prior to the War on Poverty. Children raised in fatherless homes are far more likely to grow up poor and to eventually engage in criminal behavior, than their peers who are raised in two-parent homes. In 2010, blacks (approximately 13% of the U.S. population) accounted for 48.7% of all arrests for homicide, 31.8% of arrests for forcible rape, 33.5% of arrests for aggravated assault, and 55% of arrests for robbery. Also as of 2010, the black poverty rate was 27.4% (about 3 times higher than the white rate), meaning that 11.5 million blacks in the U.S. were living in poverty.

Michael Brown was a victim alright. A victim of democrat politicians/political figures controlling their followers.

William Galston, President Bill Clinton's Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs, estimated that the welfare system, with its economic disincentives to marriage, was responsible for at least 15% to 20% of the family disintegration in the United States. Take away the obvious bias and most analysts put that number closer to 50%.

There are currently 35 states in the US that pay more on welfare than a minimum wage job pays. That is a product of liberalism from the democratic party and it will continue to erode our society as long as those under that thumb let it. Its human nature to take the easier path.

I made the choice growing up not to be a racist. Its time for many others to do the same thing. Black preachers and community leaders need to bring people together instead of allowing those like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Eric Holder tear them apart. When you stop giving them money and supporting their lavish lifestyles by saying no to that reverse-racism, and reforming the current welfare system, the problem will be fixed.

Over and over again, these politicians scream about justice. In the case of Michael Brown, you might've noticed they've all backed off now. The evidence showed him to be just another thug created by the liberal agenda.

If it were truly about justice, why didn't they show up in Memphis when the black crowd beat a white store employee? Or Springfield MO when a black gang attacked a white couple?

If they are really so concerned, why are they continuing to drive a wedge between whites and blacks while benefiting financially?

The answer is, they want racism to continue. It keeps them in that lavish lifestyle they've grown accustomed to.

Racists come in all colors, shapes and sizes and political ideologies.

When leaders of all colors, shapes, sizes and political ideologies realize this and take action, racism will eventually die away.

 

 
Print

The liberal democrats need look no further as they have found a candidate for party figurehead.

Mike Dickinson, opponent for David Brat in Virginia's 7th Congressional District, has put himself front and center as the spokesperson for liberal democrats.

A self-proclaimed hater of all things conservative, Dickinson has even astounded liberals with his "reward" offer for nude pics of Kendall Jones, the 19 yr old the left has declared war on for her posting of hunting pics on her facebook account.

This is all very ironic from one of those that condone and support the murder of children in the womb yet vehemently hate those that support life and liberty.

First let me say, though I don't personally know Kendall Jones, that I'd be more than happy to have a private, personal discussion with Mike Dickinson on this subject. I'm willing to bet at the end of our discussion, he'd be much less willing to "put a hit out" on a young female like Jones. As a father of girls, I'd gladly defend her against this hippo.

Dickinson, a failure in the adult entertainment industry, likely pays for any nudity he sees, judging from his persona and appearance.

This goofball does have a bit of a history regarding hatemongering.

Here's a few of his past comments:

 

I have a suggestion for Mike Dickinson. If you're going to "go to war" with us NRA and TEA Party folks, you should perhaps be armed with more than the vomit you've been spewing.

Many of us know what "going to war" really is.

I would venture to guess the only war you've fought is deciding which latte you want at Starbucks.

As for deserving of a target, maybe Kendall Jones has already foreseen your own future.

Perhaps this is what upsets you so?

 
Print

My Facebook news feed is inundated with posts of cute kittens, twin tornadoes, and the full quota of "I'm such and such (fill in the blank), which one are you" but the ones that really make me facepalm are the conspiracy "facts" that the libertarian crowd likes to pass to each other. Whether its the police, the government, or the military, you can count on the usual Paulbots providing a daily dose of "9/11 was a hoax", "the police are arming for war on Americans" and even that the "CIA is actually behind the ISIS takeover in Iraq".

Some of those I've had as FB friends for a long time now succumb to the pressure and actually continue passing on these "newsflashes" as if its their duty. My list of "friends" has dwindled quickly lately as this trend seems to be growing at a much faster rate and my unfriend button is showing some wear.

Much of the reason for the libertarians pushing their agenda in this way is to sow the seeds of "anti-government" in an attempt to enlist aid for their platform of legalizing drugs, allowing prostitution and supporting abortion along with having a foreign policy akin to a turtle pulling itself into a shell and ignoring the atmosphere outside of it.

You might notice that those platform items I listed above make one think I'm talking about liberal democrats. You're not far from the truth.

The Libertarian party is basically filled with liberals that oppose big government and gun control. Regarding basically every other issue at the forefront today, the overwhelming majority of those obnoxiously professing to be libertarians are part and parcel of the liberal wing of the Democrat party.

Since last Tuesday's primary election in South Carolina, countless of these Paulbots have declared that they will not vote for Lindsey Graham in the general election in November but instead vote for the Democrat Brad Hutto. There are a few that are pushing the obscure Libertarian candidate what's-his-name but the real Libertarian, Lee Bright, was easily defeated by Graham in the primary.

So, in effect, the libertarians, as part of the overall liberal plan to infiltrate and divide the Republican Party, will be doing their best to elect a liberal Democrat to the US Senate. As their efforts haven't worked in the past, they are now attempting to do it from within.

While their efforts are nowhere near getting their own candidates elected, they are affecting elections in regards to true Conservative candidates bucking the establishment. Their attempts to get a Paulbot in office by misleading others into believing they are actually conservative do nothing more than assure that the wave of those like Trey Gowdy, Jeff Duncan, Tim Scott and Jim Demint is slowed to a trickle.

I'm honestly thinking that their efforts are geared toward driving anti-government sentiment in such a way that they get more support for their hope of an armed uprising so many of them speak of. The recent shooting in Las Vegas of two cops and a concealed-carry citizen that attempted to stop their rampage was by none other than a couple of the hard-core libertarians such as those you could find in Lee Bright's list of supporters. Many of them are adamant in their hatred of the police and when the liquor is flowing, they tend to make goofy videos slurringly chastising those that don't think like them.

Maybe one day they will get their uprising.

Perhaps we can call it the "Drunk Rebellion"

 
Print

Its not often I agree with the hired bowtie Wesley Donehue but I do have to make an exception here.

On a facebook thread on Sheri Few's page, Donehue said this:

If you're wondering why I'm spending my free time getting the truth out about you now and how I'm going to do the same with your state contract, the answer is YES - because you ran radio ads LYING about Peeler's position on Common Core. And I think it's shady as hell that you are getting money to run those ads and pad your personal pocket while your campaign just happens to be singularly focused on that same issue. I find the line between your personal finances and your campaign to be very unclear, perhaps nonexistent. I think living off your "competitive bid" while railing on state and federal spending is the height of hypocrisy. And I think you're absolutely batshit friggin crazy. Lastly, everyone knows I'm arrogant but what the hell do you call begging Sally to drop out because supposedly you can win and she can't? Even I'm not that damn arrogant.

Kudos to Wesley for saying what most everyone in that thread was thinking.

In 2006 and 2008, Sheri Few ran in a primary for SC State House seat 79 and was defeated

In 2010, she ran for the seat again and actually won the primary, only to be soundly defeated by a Democrat for a seat that had been in Republican control for about 30 years. This AFTER saying she would win the general election handily.

A few days ago, after being defeated in the primary for SC Superintendent of Education, Few made news by calling for Sally Atwater to step aside and let her (Few) face Molly Spearman in the runoff.

"If Sally Atwater is not going to run a credible campaign against Molly Spearman, then she needs to step aside and let me give Republicans a clear choice on June 24th," Few said. 

Now I'm having a difficult time understanding how Sheri Few (with her record of defeats ESPECIALLY a for a seat dominated by Republicans for 30 years) thinks she's more electable than Atwater when primary voters just showed us she's not... Anyone got factual data backing up her claim?

I'm still struggling to find Sheri's qualifications for the job. Perhaps the Liberty Caucus folks that so obnoxiously pushed Lee Bright and now pushing Few could list those qualifications?

Thought not.

It appears Wesley Donehue hit the nail on the head. But then again, the group Sheri Few is running with appear to be cornering the market on "batshit friggin crazy".